![]() ![]() originating travel (one-way or roundtrip) for Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd. Includes tickets claimed for Settling Defendant airlines for all class periods.Includes tickets claimed for Settling Defendant airlines for Phase 1 and Phase 2 class periods and Co-conspirators for Phase 1 and 2 class periods.Includes tickets claimed for Settling Defendant airlines for Phase 1 and Phase 2 class periods.Includes tickets claimed for Settling Defendant airlines for Phase 1 and Phase 2 class periods and Co-conspirator airlines for Phase 1 and 2 class periods.originating travel (one-way or roundtrip) will be compensated. Includes tickets claimed for Settling Defendant airlines for Phase 1 class period. Each Defendant airline's contribution to the settlement fund is: Defendant The Court has approved thirteen settlements totaling $147,402,000. More details are in the Settlement Agreements, which are available on this website under Court Documents. It is possible that any money left after paying Class Members that is economically infeasible to distribute will be donated to charities approved by the Court. Pursuant to the proposed plan of allocation, eligible claims will receive a pro rata share of the applicable settlement funds for each class in which the claim(s) qualify. A portion of the Settlement Fund will be used to pay the costs of class notice and administration and attorneys’ fees and costs. Please note that settlements involving transpacific air travel were reached in 2015 with eight of the Defendants (including JAL), 2018 with four of the Defendants and 2020 with one of the Defendants. This guilty plea does not apply to the fuel surcharge claims alleged in this case. As a result, ticket purchasers may have paid more than was necessary.ĪNA has pled guilty to fixing the prices of certain discounted tickets for transpacific air transportation sold in the United States from at least as early as Apuntil at least April 1, 2004. for travel to Japan between Januand April 1, 2006. The lawsuit claims that ANA and JAL agreed to institute and raise fuel surcharges on airline tickets between Februand December 31, 2007, and to fix the prices of airline tickets on certain fares called Satogaeri or "homecoming" fares, which are discount fares marketed to Japanese people living in the U.S. The lawsuit also claims that ANA and JAL agreed to fix the prices of airline tickets and/or fuel surcharges for travel between the United States and Japan. (“JAL”) Malaysian Airline System Berhad Qantas Airways Limited Singapore Airlines Limited Societe Air France Thai Airways International Public Co., Ltd. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited Japan Airlines International Company, Ltd. ![]() EVA Airways Corporation Philippine Airlines, Inc. ("ANA") Air New Zealand Limited China Airlines, Ltd. The Defendants in that lawsuit are: All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. As a result, ticket purchasers may have paid more than was necessary. The original lawsuit claimed that thirteen Defendants agreed to fix the prices of airline tickets for travel between the United States and Asia/Oceania. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |